|
|
|
|
|
by natex
2017 days ago
|
|
The concerns are not being "simply dismissed". You just didn't take the time to read any of the material. "JCVI recognises that the MHRA’s advice is based on the absence of evidence in pregnancy, and
not on the presence of evidence to implicate toxicity in pregnancy." It's all laid out for anyone with true concerns. Here you go: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/... |
|
But concerns absolutely are being dismissed. I've personally listened to Matt Hancock and other ministers doing it.
The idea that someone might want to wait just a little longer to see if any side effects emerge is not necessarily irrational.
Would you not concede that, if and when any unexpected side-effects do emerge (however rare or insignificant), this gung-ho attitude will backfire?