|
|
|
|
|
by adjkant
2035 days ago
|
|
> which is extremely international Racism against Africans can be found internationally, but in this case we are talking specifically African-Americans. Being international does not mean diverse in this specific way, it just means diverse in terms of nationality. For a good example, as the article and many have highlighted, asian representation is not an issue at Coinbase. Racism isn't generalized but specific to races and cultures. A person can be prejudice to just one category or many categories. > the mechanics of crypto themselves prevent racial, gender, socioeconomic bias mechanics and community are not one in the same, and crypto is still plenty susceptible to discrimination for any transactions that begin off-network (most all, humans are social creatures). While the mechanics help a small edge case or two, I don't really see any meaningful difference. What's the real material racism that crypto stops that other forms of payment or speculative trading fall victim to? |
|
> What's the real material racism that crypto stops that other forms of payment or speculative trading fall victim to?
Access to financial services like loans for instance. No human or even AI model to judge you based on external factors.