|
|
|
|
|
by jb1991
2046 days ago
|
|
> Apple's malware track record in the mobile space is worse than its peers. You'll have to back that up with a meaningful citation because all the evidence I've seen is to the contrary. Here, I'll offer one example: > Android devices 50 times more infected with malware compared to iOS. https://www.pandasecurity.com/en/mediacenter/mobile-security... |
|
https://www.macrumors.com/2015/09/20/xcodeghost-chinese-malw...
Unlike Google and Amazon, who do both static and dynamic analysis of uploaded apps for malware, Apple relies on very basic code scanning and manual review, leaving infected apps up until they were reported externally.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/xcodeghost-ios-malware-leaves-...
Even worse, Apple does not let third party security research release apps on the App Store, making it harder for them to find and report malware to Apple.
So we have that iOS is worse than Google and Amazon Android devices as a whole. Users who care about security will not randomly choose from that whole set of devices but instead choose among those that receive rapid security updates. That subset makes the difference in security even more stark meaning that iOS users give up their privacy and get worse security.