[IncRnd]

Schwartz's beliefs and statements don't apply. Schwartz didn't write the controlling law.

[syshum]

Schwartz's was the CEO of the company that held the "copyright" should one exist at the time of the alleged "infringement"

Thus Schwartz's beliefs are and should be relevant

[IncRnd]

But, Oracle isn't Schwartz. Swartz isn't suing.

[isbvhodnvemrwvn]

Under what legal basis?

[gpderetta]

Estoppel was mentioned elsethread.