Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by syshum 2079 days ago
Schwartz's was the CEO of the company that held the "copyright" should one exist at the time of the alleged "infringement"

Thus Schwartz's beliefs are and should be relevant

2 comments

But, Oracle isn't Schwartz. Swartz isn't suing.
Under what legal basis?
Estoppel was mentioned elsethread.