| OK, so we agree that if there are X <= 3 people then they're stuck and cannot kill themselves. You claim that if X = 4 and everyone has brown eyes then on day 4 they will all kill themselves. Suppose I am one of these islanders. I can see three people with brown eyes. On days one, two and three no one kills themselves. On day four I get up and kill myself because I know that I have brown eyes. Fine, now let's consider the case where there are three people with brown eyes, and one person with green eyes: As I think we've agreed above, the three people with brown eyes cannot infer that they have brown eyes (i.e. the X < 3 case). So they are not able to kill themselves. But consider the green eyed person: he can see three people with brown eyes and no one kills themselves on days one, two or three. He is in exactly the same situation at this point as the brown eyed person we considered in the four-brown-eyed-people case. So at this point, by your logic, he must know that he has brown eyes. Which is a contradiction. I think you are wrong that induction is not involved in establishing eye colour. (unless you can convince me in the X = 4 case that is :) ). This isn't a problem I'm unfamiliar with it, a colleague asked me it when I was being interviewed for my current job, and it gets rediscussed periodically. I really do think you're wrong I'm afraid. |
Where X=4 (i.e. there are 4 people with brown eyes) it works.
In your case, where the number of people is 4, but X=3, then the fourth possibly incorrectly infers that he has brown eyes and so, on his own, kills himself. On the other hand they are "highly logical" so I argue they would realise that there were too few people to know.