[477rruruurur]

If Belarus didn't sign or ratify it then what's the relevence? Not saying the situation isn't dire anyway but it seems like when the EU gets mad at the US for not acknowledging their toy court.

[Wald76]

Belarus’s human rights abuses and crimes against humanity (as defined by the ICC) are highly relevant no matter whether its government signed the statute or not, or whether its government trolls consider it a “toy court”.

[477rruruurur]

So then it should be easy to explain the relevance of the ICC in this situation instead of just saying it's "highly relevant".

[sam_lowry_]

Some countries have the Universal jurisdiction [1].

The idea is that whenever the crime happens, it can be tried in the country. Even US had a couple of cases where Universal jurisdiction was applied.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_jurisdiction

[477rruruurur]

That doesn't really make the ICC relevant in a way worth acknowledging since by definition the same applies to many places at the same time.

[sam_lowry_]

Every country that implements Universal jurisdiction can try foreigners pretty much like ICC, yep.