[koolba]

They’re probably going to have to change their name to something that does not have “git” in it: https://public-inbox.org/git/20170202022655.2jwvudhvo4hmueaw...

[sethish]

Gitenberg was one of the alternate spellings of Gutenberg in the 1400s.

[agumonkey]

I propose Gytenberg

[artiszt]

or, widely accepted standard [in german and slavic-languages] way back then, 'v' instead of 'u', and vice versa

[agumonkey]

ah well for some reason the visual asthetics of gytenberg vs gvtenberg made me chose the former (even though at first I typed gvtenberg)

[bhickey]

> It's hard to hold them responsible for picking a name that violated a policy that didn't yet exist.

fwiw, Gitenberg has been around at least since 2012.

[metiscus]

They've been named like that for six years apparently so I'm not sure how that works for what you linked above. It is a valid point that hopefully doesn't cause problems.