[bargl]

But the outcome isn't the same for the company.

I go to lunch, and chat with co-workers. They tell me about their project and I tell them about mine.

Then I get a requirement that I have to build something that interacts with their project and I have a rough idea of how it works because we've been talking about it a little bit. So instead of starting from nothing I'm starting from some knowledge.

Even though that part of the conversation was 10 min of a 30 min conversation there are useful parts that happen in the office.

I've been trying to replicate that at home more.

[everly]

I think I understand the point you’re making and I agree that there can be some synergy that comes from working together in person but it can also go the other way. Office environments can also be toxic and decrease productivity/morale.

Plus, the situation you describe consists of the company extracting extra value from me during a time that is supposed to belong to me, not a time that they are compensating me for, which also makes your point ring hollow.

[bargl]

I wasn't clear, I meant when I'm socializing with co-workers while I'm on the clock, such as gathering around the cubicle. Not at home or a bar. Edited: for clarity.

The OP mentioned they work 4-5 hours a day and are distracted the other 3-4 when at work (in the office).

I was saying during those 3-4 hours you have multiple side conversations (on company time) that it makes sense to the company to encourage. Not just cuz co-workers who get along have a better work environment, but that it makes a more interconnected environment.

> Office environments can also be toxic and decrease productivity/morale.

This is a good point.