|
|
|
|
|
by brnt
2178 days ago
|
|
Reducing winning down to body counts is precisely what was the problem with Vietnam. Materiel, production, logistics, money to fund it all. It would be more precise to say the Russians were an American mercenary army. They were pretty much funded by them, most materiel was US produced and delivered for free. |
|
> In total, the U.S. deliveries to the USSR through Lend-Lease amounted to $11 billion in materials: over 400,000 jeeps and trucks; 12,000 armored vehicles (including 7,000 tanks, about 1,386 of which were M3 Lees and 4,102 M4 Shermans); 11,400 aircraft (4,719 of which were Bell P-39 Airacobras) and 1.75 million tons of food.
Compare with totals [2], check out USSR tanks production (119,583) [3]. And Lend Lease resources were not free - they had to be payed back.
The brilliance of USA move was helping others to fight their enemy. You can always replace goods but no way to replace a man. Without USSR they would loose a lot. Quite possibly there would be no USA today.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_industry_in_World_War_I...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_production_during_Wor...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_combat_vehicle_producti...