Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pskinner 2199 days ago
Is it just me or is this missing plain artifacts - those that are not packaged for a specific tool? I'm thinking of plain binaries and resources required for things like db build tools and automated testing tools - just files really. How do I publish a tarball up to this, for example?

Also the lack of nuget is a major issue.
1 comments
greyskull 2199 days ago
I think CodeArtifact loses value when you aren't using a package manager; the benefit is an api-compatible service with various controls and audits built on top.

Out of curiosity, what would you want from this service for the "plain binary" use-case when S3 already exists?

link
pskinner 2199 days ago
I think mainly the ease of having security dealt with around who can access etc really. Ofc you can just upload files and serve them over http, but I'd like something that's as easy to setup and use as nexus for these files - and something that forces a structure for how they are organised. Stops arguments and people doing whatever they want.
link
StreamBright 2198 days ago
>> I think mainly the ease of having security dealt with around who can access etc really. Ofc you can just upload files and serve them over http,

This is where S3 really shines. You can give developers access through group membership while servers using instance profiles. We have implemented a fine grained access control for the S3 repos that works really well. Of course you access the content via HTTPS.

link
pskinner 2198 days ago
Fair enough, I dislike having the idea of having disparate systems where one type of the same thing is stored on a different system from a second type of the same thing.

IAM is on the AWS repo aswell isn't it? I guess it wouldn't be so bad then.

link
ec109685 2199 days ago
It’s nice having the metadata around the push available versus raw blobs to s3.
link
bostik 2199 days ago
Objects in S3 can have custom metadata associated with them. Look at the returned data for the HeadObject call.[0]

It's not advertised in the documentation, but HeadObject(Bucket, Key)['Metadata'] is a neat dictionary of custom values.

0: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/API_HeadObje...

link
camhart 2199 days ago
S3 supports metadata (see https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/user-guide/add-o...).

Perhaps I don't understand what you're saying fully though--as I don't fully understand your comment.

link
StreamBright 2198 days ago
You mean like Object Metadata for S3?

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/UsingMetadat...

link