[cambalache]

If you tie your self-respect on how useful are you to the company that pays you, you are fucked. For them you are just a number.

[dwaltrip]

Shockingly, some people feel good when they do great work and have a positive impact. Often times it even results in other beneficial outcomes in their life.

[discreteevent]

So is every professional you pay money to. But you will still recommend some and not others. When times get tight, those guys still make a living.

[cambalache]

If you are an independent service worker yeah, I understand, go the extra mile with your customers, it is good for business. But if you are drone #139098123 in generic corporation X, you should not give a fuck on your reputation as long as you are doing your work. If they dump you, you go and get another job, there is a big world out there.

[sixstringtheory]

> you should not give a fuck on your reputation as long as you are doing your work

But we're talking about reputation based on the quality/quantity of work you do.

I think there's a difference between taking pride in your work, and breaking your back for your employer. I think the former is what's being advocated for in this thread.

Also, if you feel like you're drone #139098123 in a soul sucking abyss, and can't be bothered to be interested in the activity you spend a majority of your waking hours supposedly doing in this short life, then I encourage you to look for something better. I know all too well that it's easier said than done, but it's better to start while you still have the soul sucking job instead of after they "dump you."

[cambalache]

No, the original chain was about the choice of being full-gas all the time for your employer or pace yourself.

[sixstringtheory]

Let me sum up how I saw it go...

-you can get more done if you avoid addictive black holes for attention

--if they don't want you playing around they should pay you more than the salary you agreed to work for

---yup, still getting paid the same. company is getting theirs, go get yours (I think this reply was actually sarcastic)

----how do you live with yourself

-----if you have integrity you're dumb

------most people actually work for money, you'll probably get found out eventually otherwise

-------you won't get found out if you embed yourself in a big enough company where you can hide, rinse and repeat

It sounds less like an argument to pace one's self, and more like cynical entitlement.

[cambalache]

If you think checking reddit or HN at work is a cardinal sin, be my guest and run yourself to the ground doing 80 hours a week with no respite, ignoring that many many studies place peak cognitive performance at 4 hours a day at best,be a "10x" engineer and get promoted.Unless you are laid off, but that rarely happens so dont worry.

[dang]

Of course, but it could be the other way around: doing your best work as a consequence of self-respect, not the cause.

[jamespollack]

What are you on about?

Here's the post I replied to below, it said nothing about self-respect. You're the one who brought that up and still haven't explained how compensation factors into your "best work" / "self-respect" chain. Please, do share.

-------------

> Congratulations, you are now 3-10x developer. Congratulations. You are still getting paid the same.

Boosts in productivity need to come with boosts in pay, otherwise the logical thing to do is to scale back your effort to a point where the amount you get done matches the amount you get paid for.

------------

To which I said, "exactly! if you're taking home the same salary whether you're creating massive value for the company, why bother?"

---------------------

So, if someone generates 10x more value than the person next to them, you think they should both be paid the same (while the company reaps the immense profits) and that nobody should complain about the situation because of their "self-respect"? Wild.

[dang]

I was replying to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23034090, which was a comment by someone else.

On HN, please omit rude swipes like "What are you on about?", "Please, do share," and "So if someone X, you think they should Y, and nobody should complain because 'Z'? Wild." Even if you're talking to a mod, you still need to follow the rules. I also need to, and you and anyone else are welcome to point it out when I slip.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[jamespollack]

that's not what happened. if you click the link you included, your "self-respect?" comment isn't on that thread at all. because it was a reply to my comment. you're intentionally misrepresenting what happened.

let me point out how you "slipped" and took a "rude swipe" - you don't play by your own rules.

i made a post, you replied to me just saying "self-respect?" implying that i had none.

how can you just drop insulting comments like that on people who are just participating in conversation? two words, no explanation, just plain rude.

Isn't your "self-respect?" comment in bad-faith, given your own rules?

"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something."

"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."

"Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."

From the New Yorker profile of you:

"They treat their community like an encounter group or Esalen workshop; often, they correspond with individual Hacker News readers over e-mail, coaching and encouraging them in long, heartfelt exchanges."

Is that just BS? What was encouraging or heartfelt about your response to me?