|
|
|
|
|
by jlokier
2340 days ago
|
|
While I'm prepared to believe you, looking at my comment it doesn't seem that way to me. Out of interest, which damning conclusion do you think I've reached about the OP? I've avoided saying anything about whether the OP is right about whether their tech lead is an idiot. The only conclusion about the OP I see is "The poster thinks the tech lead is in idiot partly based on the fact the tech lead doesn't close as many tickets as juniors." I think that's a simple implication from the OP writing "he is not very productive — our junior engineers are lapping him on tickets closed". All the rest of my comment is about how an interviewer might likely think if that were said in the manner discussed; it's not about the OP. |
|
1. That the OP doesn't know as much as they think they do about the job of a tech lead. 2. That the OP is jumping to damning conclusions from dubious judgement. 3. That #1 and #2 correlates with being "challenging to work with."