|
|
|
|
|
by gravypod
2340 days ago
|
|
I've seen a lot of the hacker community focusing on btrfs and zfs but very little focusing on ceph. I think ceph has a lot of the features that we want in a file system and some things that aren't even possible on traditional file systems (per-file redundancy settings) with very little downsides. The setup is a little more complex involving a few daemons to manage disks, balance, monitor, etc. I wish there was something similar to FreeNAS for ceph that only focused on making the experience seemless because I think if it became more popular in the home lab space we'd see lots of cool tools pop up for it. |
|
https://louwrentius.com/understanding-ceph-open-source-scala...
But Ceph is not designed to be a competitor to BTRFS or ZFS. The core vision of Ceph is scalability. If you need petabytes of storage and the performance to scale with it, take a look at Ceph.
I may be totally wrong here, but from what I understand about Ceph, it's not meant as a file system for a single computer. I don't understand the idea of running Ceph on your laptop/desktop. It's possible to run it that way but it defeats it's purpose.
I've build a small lab setup with Ceph:
https://louwrentius.com/my-ceph-test-cluster-based-on-raspbe...
Also, there's the issue of performance, in particular latency. That's a bit of a weak spot of Ceph, from what I can tell. Again, may be wrong. But I found these notes interesting.
https://yourcmc.ru/wiki/Ceph_performance