Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mrbrowning 2337 days ago
> The whole exercise felt like taking attendance.

In my experience, almost anyone who insists on synchronous, in-person standups is doing so because they want them to function this way, whether consciously or unconsciously.

I also suspect that standups with no active brevity constraint frequently come about not because of a lack of leadership but because they're actually a means for disordered thinkers to feel productive, which I think goes part of the way towards explaining why you see such irrational attachment to standups even among ICs.

1 comments

What is an IC?
Individual Contributor. Manager euphemism for a cog in the machine.
What is the alternative to being an Individual Contributor? An...individual non-contributor? Or a non-individual contributor?
Management and leadership roles.
And they aren't said to contribute? Odd terminology.
SV-speak for labor, really, as in "the interests of capital/management and labor are, at times, opposed".
I think it was originally a Microsoft acronym.

But, yeah, IC = prole.

Never heard this before, reminds me of Idiocracy's 'Particular Individuals'
Sibling commenters got it. Sorry for the jargon, I've clearly been here too long!