[jrochkind1]

Fair enough. That probably is bad marketing if nothing else, and maybe something else. what you're saying about the major failure being in support/customer-management, even more than the technical issue, seems potentially reasonable. (I am not a Gandi customer, so it's not personal for me).

I still think the fact that there was no data loss, and we're still on the edge of calling it unacceptable incompetence, is worth noting, as to how far our expectations and standards have come. Which is good of course.

[gizmo]

The linked twitter thread explicitly mentions data loss:

> Hi Andrea. It is confirmed we have lost data and we are terribly sorry for that. However, please note that what happenend[sp] could happen to any web host.

Customers that were forced to migrate to a different webhost had to restore from whatever backups they had, and they lost data for sure. Even if Gandi ultimately recovered everything (and it's not completely clear if they did) at that point the customer data/databases have already been forked so it's too late.

[jrochkind1]

OK, that makes it even worse then. The postmortem linked above definitely says:

> We managed to restore the data and bring services back online the morning of January 13.

Is that wrong? It's bad to lose data, it's even worse to tell people you didn't lose data in one place when you did, and tell them you did lose data in another.

[ialexpw]

There was confusion with this. Originally they thought they lost all data, which is why a lot of people went crazy at them via Twitter, they later said there now might be a chance to recover data - luckily they ended up finding a way to recover it.