[gregd]

"post a link so we can judge" is precisely the attitude on SO that I find reprehensible.

[xboxnolifes]

Do you prefer avoiding hard evidence and instead forming opinions based on a comment's emotional reach?

[wokwokwok]

Why is the burden of proof is on them, not you?

Prove there are no questions where someone has been treated unfairly.

I posit you cannot.

Person A: I have been treated unfairly.

Person B: I hear this often, but no one ever offers any proof of it; I don’t believe any of these people, and posit that they are all wrong.

You tell me who seems unreasonable here.

I personally have had fights with moderators, and took my complaints to meta because they were behaving inappropriately.

Now, I cannot believe you can honestly say you’ve never seen that, because https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/92064/is-there-some..., its a damn FAQ question.

So... say what you will. I support the parent comment; you’re being totally unreasonable.

[gregd]

How is me having an issue with SO overall, any different then someone not have any issues with SO overall? One requires hard evidence and one does not?

[andrepd]

Show something to support your accusation of an entire community (or 2) seems entirely reasonable.

[gregd]

"I have no problem with x. Prove to me that you have a problem with x.", seems entirely reasonable to you?

[tempguy9999]

Yes. You post a question of yours that's been unfairly shut down. If you have no such question you clearly don't have a problem with x.

[doublement]

I've never had a question closed, but I have had to deal with condescending responses. If I've gotten too much shit on a question, I usually delete it after I've gotten the information I need, rendering the evidence unavailable (even to myself as the poster after a window of time).

[tempguy9999]

You (claim to) delete useful answers, then complain about SO's behaviour? Wow.

[doublement]

Stack Overflow curates its public-facing content, and so do I, when using real-name accounts. Given a choice between being seen taking shit from someone, investing time in arguing with that person, or just erasing the exchange altogether, the third option is sometimes the most expedient. I don't do it often.

Ideally people would just be polite, and questions could just be answered by anyone who cared to answer them, with low-scoring exchanges de-emphasized instead of being shut down.