Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by xboxnolifes 2374 days ago
Do you prefer avoiding hard evidence and instead forming opinions based on a comment's emotional reach?
2 comments

Why is the burden of proof is on them, not you?

Prove there are no questions where someone has been treated unfairly.

I posit you cannot.

Person A: I have been treated unfairly.

Person B: I hear this often, but no one ever offers any proof of it; I don’t believe any of these people, and posit that they are all wrong.

You tell me who seems unreasonable here.

I personally have had fights with moderators, and took my complaints to meta because they were behaving inappropriately.

Now, I cannot believe you can honestly say you’ve never seen that, because https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/92064/is-there-some..., its a damn FAQ question.

So... say what you will. I support the parent comment; you’re being totally unreasonable.

How is me having an issue with SO overall, any different then someone not have any issues with SO overall? One requires hard evidence and one does not?