I actually learned something today about pathfinding by (re) reading that post for 15 mins. The papers linked make no sense to me. Maybe the paper authors need make abstracts and summaries more approachable.
The authors are optimising for communicating with their peers: scientists and academic researchers.
If you find this communication hard to digest, then chances are you are not part of the intended audience. It is then mostly pointless to try to change their wording.
There is enough other material (books, Web articles) from other people who deliberately target developers.
If you find this communication hard to digest, then chances are you are not part of the intended audience. It is then mostly pointless to try to change their wording.
There is enough other material (books, Web articles) from other people who deliberately target developers.