1. Autism, Asperger types have a hard time interpreting sarcasm, body language, talking behind people's back while keeping a tactful appearance, reading the emotional atmosphere of the room and verbal communication which is not literal. These are called social skills and women are better at it. It takes a whole lotta time for Autistic types to develop these.
2. Ugly people will be considered creepy if they flirt, the thesis of the OP. It is very uncomfortable to watch Autistic types flirt and they are most likely to not understand body language cues.
3. You don't have to give them a pass at being dicks and lacking manners, but again you have to tell them in their own language ... but expect whole lotta whys. Silencing people, bullying them for their independent thoughts is a pathetic solution to a shitty problem.
There is nothing there about "feminist popes", or Galileo.
Your thesis, as presented here, is internally inconsistent, weakly supported, and depends on overgeneralized extrapolations.
As I wrote earlier, if your #1 is, then it "means that Stallman should have been kicked out long ago because he was being surrounded by enablers and yes-men who didn't provide the feedback he needed for his position."
Which is one of the arguments presented in this link.
Your #2 is unsupported because you haven't shown that most women thought Stallman was ugly. While I've been able to demonstrate places where women thought Stallman was a creep.
Your #3 is irrelevant because Stallman is not being silenced. He can continue to speak as he wishes. He is just not able to use his associations with MIT or the FSF to support his speech.
This is part-and-parcel of the right of free association, which is an essential liberty.
Sure I'll take criticism .... you don't even have a thesis to begin with. You don't even have evidence other than tweets of who are they even? Some two yes-men for women? Haven't we seen that before.
You can research these ... conditions.
And you conveniently ignore pedo feminists for your own political victimhood narrative.
Which undermines your earlier thesis.