[eesmith]

There is nothing there about "feminist popes", or Galileo.

Your thesis, as presented here, is internally inconsistent, weakly supported, and depends on overgeneralized extrapolations.

As I wrote earlier, if your #1 is, then it "means that Stallman should have been kicked out long ago because he was being surrounded by enablers and yes-men who didn't provide the feedback he needed for his position."

Which is one of the arguments presented in this link.

Your #2 is unsupported because you haven't shown that most women thought Stallman was ugly. While I've been able to demonstrate places where women thought Stallman was a creep.

Your #3 is irrelevant because Stallman is not being silenced. He can continue to speak as he wishes. He is just not able to use his associations with MIT or the FSF to support his speech.

This is part-and-parcel of the right of free association, which is an essential liberty.

[foobar_]

Sure I'll take criticism .... you don't even have a thesis to begin with. You don't even have evidence other than tweets of who are they even? Some two yes-men for women? Haven't we seen that before.

You can research these ... conditions.

And you conveniently ignore pedo feminists for your own political victimhood narrative.

[eesmith]

My thesis is that ""fat and ugly" is not the definition of a creep." It was the first sentence of the first comment I made in this thread.