Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nailer 5641 days ago
It could be a good basis to screen employers.
2 comments

A company's HR department (or just one HR employee) being shitty doesn't mean the rest of the company must also be shitty.
I agree 100%. And I send resumes rather than LinkedIn profiles. I've worked in corporates in great teams and HR have been, well, HR (an industry where people generally end up after being unable to do whatever else they wanted to).

But perhaps you don't want to work in an organization where parts of the organization are allowed to suck? Where hiring is considered important enough for resumes to go straight to your manager? There's a not a lot of these places, but they're often the ones with the top talent (and they're likely to find your resume than you have to chase them).

If you never get beyond the HR gatekeepers, you may never discover how good/bad the company itself is beyond that.
You're actually advocating screening employers based on how well they respond to you breaking their recruitment process?
In one sense, it's an indicator that they don't think the way you think.

This could be the kiss of death for a junior job seeker, but for those people who are more senior, experienced and can be choosers as opposed to beggars, it might be an OK screening method.

Yes. If they value process over logic that's an excellent basis for screening.