|
|
|
|
|
by zwaps
2513 days ago
|
|
Ah sure. So it's basically one of these concepts of what a modern city should be.
You have cars and traffic completely underground, on top a relative open area with shops on different levels and high rise buildings for living (as to have public space).
It seems like a great idea conceptually, because it affords much space to pedestrians, green spots and still allows accessibility. But it failed to be attractive to the intended audience - well off young workers and families. It is not a slum and never was, but it did not turn out have the demand. If you look at it now, it seems downright ugly. There's space, yes, but it's so much concrete, so many bleak looking high rises.
It certainly isn't "beautiful" in the sense of the rest of Paris (except if you appreciate that sort of architecture, which I actually do). |
|
Which is sad because it’s next to one of the nicest neighbourhoods in the city (Cabbagetown).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._James_Town?wprov=sfti1