|
|
|
|
|
by ummm32
2526 days ago
|
|
Quite fair, but not 100% certain. Almost nobody really knows how developed is the state-of-the-art theory / applied technology in confidentials advances that the usual suspects may have already achieved. I.E. deepmind, openai, baidu, nsa, etc. AGI could have already been achieved - even theoretically - somewhere, and like when Edison got to make work a light bulb, we're still using oil and not knowing anything about electricity, or light bulbs or energy distribution networks / infrastructure. The actual current - new, mostly unimplemented yet - technology level. Back then you wouldn't have believed if someone had said you "hey, city nights in ten years won't be dark anymore" |
|
There's no way to disprove it, but given that in the open literature people haven't even found a way to coherently frame the question of general AI, let alone theorize about it, it becomes just another form of magical thinking.