Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kjar 2546 days ago
"Safer Nuclear Reactors Are on the Way" this kind of headline pops up every few years. Too bad it takes a decade to build these things, they cost billions, they produce harmful waste that persists for thousands of years, and in failure cases produce exclusion zones for thousands of years. Effort and investment would be better spent on solar and wind power projects.
2 comments

Fossil fuels already kill millions. According to Stewart Brand, the nuclear waste for one’s entire life would fit into a can of soda. And despite nimbyism, there’s already a solution for the waste in the US: Yucca Mountain.

Oh, and it doesn’t produce the greenhouse gases that are currently threatening global stability in a timeframe of decades.

We shouldn’t minimize a technology’s shortcomings, but we should at least frame it fairly and soberly among our set of options.

Yucca Mountain was never built and the project defunded in 2011.
"Too cheap to meter" - my ass
That's fusion not fission apparently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_cheap_to_meter
There's is no good evidence that phrase was about fusion.

https://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/2016/06/03/too-cheap-to-...

Cheers. (Oh Wikipedia! You led me astray!)