I disagree with you, but am curious about your argument. Wouldn’t this cut off the brain drain that’s contributed to decades of American technological supremacy and economic growth?
> Are you trying to credit Chinese students as the sole reason for America's technological supremacy and economic growth?
No, but more is more. The carrot is the cream of a billion people tasting American culture and having the opportunity to contribute to it. I’m just trying to see the counterbalancing, and un-mitigatable, cost or risk.
Elite Chinese talent is more likely to return to China, and therefore it becomes counter-productive. Plus, the US is in direct competition with China, which isn't the case with most other countries. So, to simply say "more is more" in this circumstance is false.
It's hardly a tragedy that rich kids in China can't attend Ivy League schools in the US.
Are you trying to credit Chinese students as the sole reason for America's technological supremacy and economic growth? Ha ha good try but no.
Besides, India isn't affected by this and they make up equal share of foreign students in American Universities.
Plus, you know, western European students, African students, Russian, etc, have also contributed over the decades.
China isn't everything.