[barryrandall]

While hosting her email on Google apps. https://securitytrails.com/domain/Elizabethwarren.com/dns

[wcarron]

Is this supposed to be an indictment of her character or something? Perhaps you're suggesting she's a hypocrite?

In any case, care to elaborate?

[anonuser123456]

It is generally good form that politicians put their money where their mouth is.

[wcarron]

Using GMail while advocating breaking up some anti-competitive/monopolistic practices/companies isn't hypocrisy.

It's using a singular product to do what that singular product doe; which is fine. I can advocate Johnson and Johnson be fined for anti-competitive practices and still buy a stupid band-aid without abandoning my morals. Why would an email provider be any different?

[kpU8efre7r]

What's your point?

[justinclift]

Perhaps someone trying to radically change the way company X does business, in ways the leaders of said business aren't going to like... shouldn't store (or even transmit) their private correspondence about it using the services of the company.

I mean, that would _normally_ be common sense. Seems weird to even have to point this out.

[throwaway082729]

If she breaks up Google Search and Gmail, and Google decides to shut down gmail, she'll not have an email service and lose all her email.

[dentemple]

Yeah, because Google would totally shut it down overnight without any warning

[dragonwriter]

Before she can fulfill ant campaign promises like that, her campaign email will have fulfilled its purpose, anyway. So even if that were a likely outcome, I don't see why it would be a concern.

[PhasmaFelis]

You guys know you can download your entire Gmail archive and move it to a different service?