Perhaps someone trying to radically change the way company X does business, in ways the leaders of said business aren't going to like... shouldn't store (or even transmit) their private correspondence about it using the services of the company.
I mean, that would _normally_ be common sense. Seems weird to even have to point this out.
Before she can fulfill ant campaign promises like that, her campaign email will have fulfilled its purpose, anyway. So even if that were a likely outcome, I don't see why it would be a concern.
I mean, that would _normally_ be common sense. Seems weird to even have to point this out.