|
|
|
|
|
by robocat
2601 days ago
|
|
It is most definitely not "strictly" an engineering issue. By that logic you can say it is a quality control, FAA or management issue (and not an engineering issue) - because the engineering problem was not caught by other systems. Also "engineering" created the AoA disagree alert. Whoever decided to make that an optional feature should be "strictly" at fault? Maybe it is the fault of the airlines that decided not to have that feature installed? Engineering is just one part of a complex system so why do you think engineering should be blamed 100% for failures that occurred due to the whole system? |
|
Because that's the only way something this complicated can possibly work. Fault tolerance is optional only if failure is considered to be a valid option.
Getting back to what happened in this case: at some point, a Boeing engineer was asked to make MCAS work with input from only one AoA sensor. That person could have made all the difference by saying, "Lol no," and SPEEA would have had their back.