|
|
|
|
|
by CamperBob2
2601 days ago
|
|
Engineering is just one part of a complex system so why do you think engineering should be blamed 100% for failures that occurred due to the whole system? Because that's the only way something this complicated can possibly work. Fault tolerance is optional only if failure is considered to be a valid option. Getting back to what happened in this case: at some point, a Boeing engineer was asked to make MCAS work with input from only one AoA sensor. That person could have made all the difference by saying, "Lol no," and SPEEA would have had their back. |
|
I think failure is always acceptable engineering: a defining feature of engineering is finding compromises because we don't have infinite resources, infinite ability, or perfect materials.
> a Boeing engineer was asked to make MCAS work
That sounds like you are just making stuff up about a team of engineers. So your opinion is this is all the fault of a single engineer? Not engineering after all?