|
|
|
|
|
by barry-cotter
2635 days ago
|
|
If your city is built on a sponge and in the flattest state to boot your solutions look like seasteading, not dams and pumps. From an engineering point of view Miami should be looking to Venice, not Amsterdam. You can’t save Florida land by pumping so the only way to go is to make your own taller land or to build what amount to boats or oil rigs. |
|
If the foundations will still be tenable, and the buildings are built appropriately (e.g. parking garage for first level), they're going to be there.
For older ones? Hell, Americans were lifting entire buildings 6' in the 1850s: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raising_of_Chicago
Miami already has canals, so swapping transportation from roads to waterways isn't a huge leap. Where you really need a road, loft it up above the water. Roads are probably the lightest / easiest thing to lift.
That said... the real killer of the city is likely to be drinking water access. Groundwater in porous limestone means saltwater infiltration doesn't just flood, it mixes with freshwater.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-08-29/miami-s-o...
Reconfiguring height is a one-time problem. Desalination of all your drinking water is a much more expensive problem.