|
|
|
|
|
by ethbro
2635 days ago
|
|
This is what annoyed me a bit about the article. Sea level rise doesn't seem like that much of a problem. If the foundations will still be tenable, and the buildings are built appropriately (e.g. parking garage for first level), they're going to be there. For older ones? Hell, Americans were lifting entire buildings 6' in the 1850s: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raising_of_Chicago Miami already has canals, so swapping transportation from roads to waterways isn't a huge leap. Where you really need a road, loft it up above the water. Roads are probably the lightest / easiest thing to lift. That said... the real killer of the city is likely to be drinking water access. Groundwater in porous limestone means saltwater infiltration doesn't just flood, it mixes with freshwater. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-08-29/miami-s-o... Reconfiguring height is a one-time problem. Desalination of all your drinking water is a much more expensive problem. |
|