|
|
|
|
|
by ei8htyfi5e
2642 days ago
|
|
I funded a paper mapping vegetation in a forest, if you're curious: https://www.philsalesses.com/s/a582379.pdf IIRC, the lidar still lined up mostly because tree stems tend to not move, however, the larger problem was the error rate of the lidar sensor we were using. Readings further than 10m and the Hokuyo we were using tended to underestimate distances, so each scan of the forest looked a little but like the floor was curving over like that scene from Inception. Although maybe only 20 degrees. Still enough to be annoying. |
|
Calibration, including range biases, is probably the one factor with the greatest impact on mapping quality. For example, range bias may cause curved walls, and beam angle biases may cause curved ground.
I recall that the top scoring lidar SLAM algorithms on the KITTI data set all had to perform some calibration (for example, J. E. Deschaud found that all the beams on the Velodyne HDL-64E were tilted by 0.22 degrees [1]).
The Ouster OS-1 lidars have a slight range bias for highly reflective objects [2] but this will be fixed in a firmware update in the near future.
[0] https://pics.dllu.net/file/dllu-sc/6beea0708a.png [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08633 [2] https://www.ouster.io/s/OS-1-Datasheet.pdf