My frequency of lawbreaking would indeed (anti-)correlate with the quality of moral decisionmaking, and my frequency of lawbreaking is likely lower than those who have been convicted (at least if severity-weighted).
Further, the comparison was against convicts, who do it frequently and severely enough that someone finds it worth the money to prosecute and get a conviction. And at that point, yes, a correlation appears.
You're still making the same fallacy: "I can find an exception, so the correlation doesn't hold." That doesn't follow.
Further, the comparison was against convicts, who do it frequently and severely enough that someone finds it worth the money to prosecute and get a conviction. And at that point, yes, a correlation appears.
You're still making the same fallacy: "I can find an exception, so the correlation doesn't hold." That doesn't follow.
(And, FWIW, I don't drive to work.)