[btreecat]

> Nazis don't exist. They used to, before most of us were born, but they don't exist any more.

So what's the term for a bunch of white guys shouting "Jews will not replace us" while holding swastika, iron cross, and Nazi eagle symbols?

[apostacy]

The term I would use is: 4chan users engaged in Live Action Role Playing. They were trying to spook you, and they did, apparently. The most they could muster from the entire world is < 200.

I remember when the media tried telling us about how "Anonymous" were "hackers on steroids" who treated things like a "real life video game".[1]

Yes, there are some creeps out there. But they are not a serious threat.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=128IR21ZQa0

[btreecat]

>The term I would use is: 4chan users engaged in Live Action Role Playing.

Role playing Nazis, by choice. And this wasn't a historical reenactment, or even a skit/play. This was an attempt at showing fear through symbology and crowd size.

You seem to sympathize with them in a very odd manor.

>They were trying to spook you, and they did, apparently.

LOL I see what you pathetically tried to do there.

Please explain, what's so friendly and cuddly about people who's ideology involves extermination of other humans.

>The most they could muster from the entire world is < 200

Not sure what you mean, feel free to clarify.

>I remember when the media tried telling us about how "Anonymous" were "hackers on steroids" who treated things like a "real life video game"

So because one news outlet was wrong one time, we should now disregard all reporting from any outlet till the end of time. Got it.

>Yes, there are some creeps out there. But they are not a serious threat.

You are an expert on what defines a serious threat now too! So in your clearly expert opinion (/s) what is the definition of a "serious threat?"