|
|
|
|
|
|
by apostacy
2646 days ago
|
|
|
The term I would use is: 4chan users engaged in Live Action Role Playing. They were trying to spook you, and they did, apparently. The most they could muster from the entire world is < 200. I remember when the media tried telling us about how "Anonymous" were "hackers on steroids" who treated things like a "real life video game".[1] Yes, there are some creeps out there. But they are not a serious threat. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=128IR21ZQa0 |
|
|
Role playing Nazis, by choice. And this wasn't a historical reenactment, or even a skit/play. This was an attempt at showing fear through symbology and crowd size.
You seem to sympathize with them in a very odd manor.
>They were trying to spook you, and they did, apparently.
LOL I see what you pathetically tried to do there.
Please explain, what's so friendly and cuddly about people who's ideology involves extermination of other humans.
>The most they could muster from the entire world is < 200
Not sure what you mean, feel free to clarify.
>I remember when the media tried telling us about how "Anonymous" were "hackers on steroids" who treated things like a "real life video game"
So because one news outlet was wrong one time, we should now disregard all reporting from any outlet till the end of time. Got it.
>Yes, there are some creeps out there. But they are not a serious threat.
You are an expert on what defines a serious threat now too! So in your clearly expert opinion (/s) what is the definition of a "serious threat?"