[Spivak]

This feature isn't about security. Email is already pretty secure with TLS and DKIM. This is basically the equivalent of the "DO NO FORWARD" header people use for internal-only information but with a little more UX polish.

[kzzzznot]

I think what the parent is saying is that they feel this DO NOT FORWARD header feature is being presented as a security feature. I probably agree

[anticensor]

This is an algorithmically enforced one, though.

[Stuckinsofa]

But anyone can screenshot the message or take a photo of it. The point is that it's not actually enforced.

[beatgammit]

Anyone can screenshot or take a photo of any decrypted message. The question is when the email leaves Google's servers and whether you can trust Google with that same document.

Personally, if I had a message where I would consider a tool like this, I would just encrypt it on the client with PGP or something.

[lodi]

> Anyone can screenshot or take a photo of any decrypted message.

Yes, but ordinary decrypted messages don't claim to have superpowers like self-destructing.

[Stuckinsofa]

The person I replied to wrote that this was "algorithmically enforced". I'm just pointing out that this is incorrect.

[TrueDuality]

As long as it doesn't leave Gmail.

[hammock]

I believe Gmail already has that feature for corporate gsuite- greying out the forward button or something like that. Could be wrong. I know for sure Outlook has it.