| >The NY Times and other resources currently considered "credible" Yea, but... >The NY Times in particular has unfortunately been burning through that hard-earned credibility capital at an alarming rate Ah, never mind you got it. >More recently they have taken the bait proffered by Trump How this isn't being observed by more people is stunning. 100% of the time, NYT, CNN, MSNBC, WaPo are running what they think is an effective awareness and information campaign - and is in reality going to cause scandal fatigue and hurt their credibility. Everyone complains about his Twitter... stop airing every single one of his tweets. In another two years, the country won't be on fire, and statistically Trump has a good chance at re-election. All the media pearl clutching, faux-rage, and surface depth "activism" aren't helping... well, it's not helping them anyhow. |
I agree but it takes 5 minutes to write an article about how 'terrifying' the latest tweet is by the president and that article will generate a lot of clicks to have a high margin on return so I don't expect to see this stuff go away.
They're a business and have to publish articles to make money and can't just sit on every thing waiting for a big story so I understand. I think all you can do is just ignore it.