Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by darkpuma 2723 days ago
> "I.e. naked or compromising pictures of themselves getting leaked. I would guess this wouldn't be a problem with radar as it doesn't create images."

Give 'the internet' access to this technology and it will probably only take a week for perverts to weaponize it and fetishize it.

1 comments

If the technology were fetishised, the tech itself would acquire the status of fetish, which isn't the same as the tech being used to ends of fulfilling a fetish (e.g voyeurism). Some brands arguably promote technology fetishism, but fetishism isn't necessarily sexual, for instance the theory of commodity fetishism.
Just to be clear, I'm talking about weird dudes with prurient motivations scanning unconsenting people through the walls of their homes.
I think in this case you want to replace "fetishize" with "pervert." The verb, not the noun, but the word fits.
To expound, why people are taking issue with word choice:

fet·ish·ize - verb - Make (something) the object of a sexual fetish.

Ergo, fetishizing the technology prolly isn't what you meant.

I think it's pretty clear that they meant using the technology to fulfil a (sexual) fetish.

Granted, it's not ordinary usage, but in context, I think the meaning was decipherable.

s/fetishize the technology/fetishize the product of the technology/
You mean cops?
Including but not limited to cops, sure.