Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mazelife 2750 days ago
This gets us classifications all the way from "no starch at all" (i.e. soup) to "non-starch surrounded on all sides by the starch" (i.e. calzone). But I posit the existence of an eighth category... that is to say the inverse of the calzone, which would be "starch surrounded on all sides by a non-starch"? An anti-calzone, if you will. Seems rather rare, but not impossible (e.g. turkey with stuffing).
10 comments

Once, while working in a pizza place I theorized the creation of what I like to call the Dyson Pizza. Sauce, cheese, and toppings completely encircling a sphere of bread.
I have a dream of a spherical creme brulee, which presumably can only be cooked in zero gravity.
It’s appropriate that such a thing could only be baked in space.
It's suddenly obvious that not only could this be baked in space, it absolutely will be. This will be a thing when space tourism comes online. I only hope they still call it a Dyson pizza.
Quick, someone tell Elon Musk.
The best would be a hollow sphere so that the crust is thin!
can you do a pizza Klein bottle?
Another example would be a glazed donut (starch surrounded by sugar).
But what if it is a donut that is both filled and glazed? Is the glaze just on top or all the way round?

What does a beef Wellington count as? It has multiple nested layers... what if you made a turducken and wrapped each bird in a flatbread of some kind, before stuffing it in a larger bird?

Beef Wellington is in the same class as calzones. Possibly as a cascade thereof.
Doesn't the toroidal topology of a donut mean that both the starch and sugar are simultaneously surrounding each other?
Some of the post's salad examples (spaghetti, poutine) could be interpreted as starch surrounded by non-starch. Thus I believe the rule would still consider turkey with stuffing to be a salad.
It’s not a salad if it’s a single cohesive unit. If you chopped it up, it could pass as a “turkey salad” I guess, in the sense of a potato salad, but that would still be a stretch.
Yes, Spaghetti is misclassified as "Salad". It is a solid starch entity where if you sampled any part of the cube, you would get some starch. A loaf of bread, a baked potato, etc are all anti-calzones.
I believe that fits the last one, below the main classifications - "salad", where the starch is mixed in with the non-starch instead of wrapping it.
I believe biscuits and gravy would qualify by that measure. There's a negligible amount of starch in the gravy, but it's largely fat.
But what if you take that turkey then bread it and fry it?
call em' gallatines
I think co-calzone is probably most sensible.

Though the whole topic is a mess: an open-faced sandwich suddenly is a self-dual food.

Self duals are entirely reasonable! A unified theory of food would be incomplete if we excluded such beautiful symmetries.
So where are we heading?

It seems we might slip from group theory to category theory. At which point we are surely describing the structure of meta-sandwiches (in that they sandwich various definitions of sandwichness between each other)

I think you're onto something, after all burritos are just endofunctors in the category of monoids.
So called "open-faced sandwiches" are not sandwiches.
Projected into two dimensions, they are.