|
|
|
|
|
|
by mmt
5703 days ago
|
|
|
If I understand correctly, it's suggesting that having formal levels, regardless of whether managers do or not, is what's undesirable. I infer the alternative to be flat, such that there's only difference in compensation, with no difference in formal title. Perhaps I'm biased, since I very much believe you can call me whatever you want, as long as I'm suitably paid. This function-over-form attitude is why I prefer startups. |
|
|
Then I'm biased, too. I don't work for a start-up (100+ employees, with only seven of us doing software development), but we really don't have "career tracks." There are two management positions in our group (VP and lead engineer), so unless one of them leaves the company, no one is moving up, nor do titles change, even with raises. And this suits me perfectly fine.