Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by djcjr 2756 days ago
Market forces suck at valuing life.

Each country has to decide whether to shoulder the responsiblity of citizen health, or leave it to the market.

3 comments

On a personal level we tend to say "life is precious and I value it." or at least those are the virtues we attempt to signal.

When we act in concert through markets we tend to say "life is cheap and I don't really care that badly."

People always lament and say that the market gets it wrong but does it? Or is the truth about how we really feel just a little too horrifying uncomfortable?

More the latter, but it’s a bit more nuanced: It’s more honest to say the each of us values a select few others (for me, maybe a dozen) and everyone else’s life I don’t value.
That's a fair comment. Though I would say it's not that you don't value those with a greater psychological distance from you it's that you value them in the abstract and it doesn't concretely translate to materially caring about them.
As a rule of thumb, consider writing "I" instead of "we".
I'm actively making a generalization about a behavioral pattern I see playing out among an aggregate of people with regards to what they say with their actions vs. what they say with their words.

"I" doesn't make sense in that context. I could change it to "people" but I don't think I'm excluded from the behavioral pattern, so "we" it is.

Yeah I’m going to go with “read the article” before using that copypasta

The Goldman Sachs analyst was really not that cold blooded

Suck how? Is the valuation different from that of most people?

I value the life of most people I don’t know at a few cents, looking at my past behaviour (buy the simplest of unnecessary things instead of donating to African child vaccination).