Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by matt4077 2811 days ago
Banking seems to be doing pretty fine, actually. Can't remember any cases where customers lost money.

So maybe they are doing something right.

> the threat/worry of bad publicity

Yeah , that hasn't worked for Exxon Valdez, nor for any of the recent data dump incidents.

3 comments

To the contrary. Banking is scared shitless. Internet access to banking account is not a matter of if you lose money but when.

The Underworld is now multibilion dollars business and is getting better at it's trade with every day. It is relatively safe and lucrative.

Identity theft, SIM swap, SWIFT half a bilion dollars theft in Bangladesh, South Africa - Japan credit cards. Just to name a few.

Remember that money at the end of the day is based on trust. If you cannot trust that the money on your account are safe. Or if your money is not liquid because banks have to manualy verify dubious transactions then your money are loosing value.

1 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Bank_robbery

2 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36357182

3 http://fortune.com/2017/05/05/wire-transfer-fraud-emails/

Presumably we're ignoring Identity Fraud when we say banking is doing pretty fine?

Obligatory Mitchell and Webb "Identity Theft" link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9ptA3Ya9E

Banks are doing security right because it is in their best interest.

The average IT company however doesn't care much about leaks of customer data, except perhaps for the publicity effects.