|
|
|
|
|
by code_duck
2829 days ago
|
|
In guitar playing, I am constantly thinking about the distance the notes in terms of frets (half steps) but it’s relative. Making the pitch a digit where 0 is C and 6 is always f# (or whatever) doesn’t quite work with how I think musically and I’m not sure it’s an improvement. You’re dropping the notation relating to keys, why still base it around C? I’d prefer to make A zero, or E, for guitar players. I do like having the octave embedded in the notation. I’m not comfortable with using 0-9 and a-b as pitch. The last two (known for hundreds of years as G and g#) stand out awkwardly. Maybe just ditch the whole thing and use Hz. |
|
A more interesting question in my mind is if you're going to change things up, why keep 12 notes per octave? Why not 8 notes per ... octave :-) Or 16?
Also, since this is a log scale, could we write a new notation which indeed does have 8 notes per 'octave', but which uses a different definition of an 'octave', and could be used to write the same music we play today.
[1] http://pages.mtu.edu/~suits/notefreqs.html