|
|
|
|
|
by chrispeel
2829 days ago
|
|
If you take the log of the frequencies in Hz [1], then the difference between notes is a fixed step. A fixed step means that you can index the notes with an integer. So this notation is close to representing things in Hz. It's fairly easy to interpret each note as a duodecimal integer and write an equation for the corresponding frequency in Hz. BTW, why 'dozenal' and not 'duodecimal'? A more interesting question in my mind is if you're going to change things up, why keep 12 notes per octave? Why not 8 notes per ... octave :-) Or 16? Also, since this is a log scale, could we write a new notation which indeed does have 8 notes per 'octave', but which uses a different definition of an 'octave', and could be used to write the same music we play today. [1] http://pages.mtu.edu/~suits/notefreqs.html |
|
Why not have 16 notes per octave? Uh... wow, well, because it sounds bizarre and would make it difficult to play all existing western music in addition to confusing to every musician practiced in contemporary standard music. Why not 8? Hmm. Are you actually a musician or just speculating?