|
|
|
|
|
by RyanRies
2872 days ago
|
|
If you're a professional or part of a professional organization, this is a small hurdle to clear and most would agree that the increased security posture for the end user is worth the inconvenience/price for developers. If you're an amateur/hobbyist/tinkerer and just want to play with kernel driver development, then you can disable the signing enforcement. Anyway I'm sorry for derailing from the actual point of this post - it's a very cool project! |
|
It also means, that we will not get some nice things, we would otherwise have. See also iSCSI initiator or FUSE for macOS. They have same problem - need to be signed by the right certificate, so nobody bothered.
Other systems, when they are running in Secure Boot mode, also accept kernel modules signed by the same keys, that are enrolled into UEFI. Why can't Windows and Mac do the same?