No one's going to get sued for a reimbursement policy. They don't have an obligation to reimburse, and this falls so far outside of fair employment laws. HN is going nuts on this one.
Well, they don't have an obligation to reimburse, but reimbursing in a discriminatory fashion could still be legally suspect. There's a difference between not reimbursing at all and reimbursing in a way that excludes certain people. Just like that case with Uber and jackets only for male team members - nobody is required to give out free jackets, but if you only give ones to males and not females, you'll end up in trouble. If not legal one than certainly PR one.
Why do you say that? It’s certainly in line with the spirit of the ADA, and a cursory Google suggests that lawsuits related to dietary restrictions have been successful.
For what it’s worth, I’m a vegetarian and broadly in support of this policy, assuming it can be made compliant with the law.
I wouldn't be so sure.
> They don't have an obligation to reimburse
They don't have an obligation to hire people, either, but if hiring doesn't make reasonable accommodations for disability, it's still illegal.