[brockf]

No reason to oversimplify and ignore a lot of important details — they're doing that for you!

[cs702]

The original link was to the actual paper[a], not the blog post!

A moderator, dang, changed the link after I posted my comment; see his comment [b] elsewhere in this thread.

Had the original link been to the blog post, I agree, there would have been no need to simplify.

[a] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-018-0147-8

[b] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17068449

[alex_duf]

I'm quite happy with the blog post, I don't have enough background to understand the paper