|
|
|
|
|
by gsnedders
2996 days ago
|
|
If they are a party to the investigation, ignoring the non-disclosure rules makes Tesla seem to me like a dodgy company willing to act against established norms designed to ensure transport safety, and I hope they get the book thrown at them for it. If they are not a party to the investigation, I'd question why not. When was the last time an aircraft manufacturer declined to be a party to the investigation? They recognise that if they get a reputation for being unsafe that has repercussions for future sales; I'd hope the same was true of car manufacturers! To me, there's literally no way this makes Tesla look good. |
|
Are not a party to the investigation -- motives questioned, discovering facts takes longer or impossible
Are a party to the investigation and information can only be released by NTSB -- share price gets hammered every time there's a crash and everyone else gets a chance to put out information
I'm inclined to lead towards "special circumstances" here. Does every Ford crash make national news?