|
|
|
|
|
by tinymollusk
3067 days ago
|
|
What's the evidence that learning/adaptation happens in a positive direction in markets? Without the directionality indicator, it sounds more like "this system has changed" rather than "this system has improved". Also, the positive assertion that markets learn/adapt requires evidence more than the negative. The default assumption should be that the market changes randomly. |
|
The superior economic growth rates seen in countries with more economic freedom.
There's also the work done by Andrew Lo showing markets adapt and learn:
http://mitsloan.mit.edu/newsroom/articles/why-financial-mark...
>>Also, the positive assertion that markets learn/adapt requires evidence more than the negative. The default assumption should be that the market changes randomly.
I don't see the basis of assuming markets change randomly. Markets are composed of individuals who adapt and learn, and in a free market, theory would suggest people will adapt to configurations that tend to be mutually beneficial.
The market process of profit and loss also rewards better utilizers of capital with more capital, and less effective utilizers with less, so one would expect the market to evolve to become more effective at utilizing capital.